Snapdragon vs Exynos on Samsung S20 Ultra

Snapdragon vs Exynos on Samsung S20 Ultra

Which is better Snapdragon vs Exynos in S20 Ultra:

It’s Snapdragon vs Exynos. Every time Samsung makes a new flagship smartphone, they create two versions. One powered by an Exynos chip and one powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon chip. On the face of it, the difference is so big the Snapdragon version almost feels like a different smartphone.

Performance:

Benchmarks aren’t everything. There is a much better test of power than just seeing how fast apps open. For seeing the score on Antutu of Snapdragon vs Exynos, so run Antutu on both and the Snapdragon is just way ahead of a 550000 vs 500000. It’s almost a 10% jump that’s half a generational leap of performance. If you think that’s a big gap, it gets so much bigger. After running Antutu once, we run it three more times continuously to see if either chip would overheat. In the second run, this Snapdragon chip was at 40 degrees Celsius which is good. In the third run, it jumps to 42. After the final one, it went down to 39.


Snapdragon vs Exynos on Samsung S20 Ultra

But in the Exynos after just two runs of the benchmark, it was at 59 degrees. After running 3, it had managed to control that temperature. It brought to 53. The last run pushed it to 66 degrees. Its too hot temperature.

Thermal Throttling:

Finally, the chip gets hotter. That’s not something you’re going to feel directly but what it translates to is thermal throttling. The Exynos starts dialing its performance back when it gets hot. It’s a problem that it gets hot so quickly. While the Snapdragon score fell from around 550,000 to about 545,000 throughout these benchmarks. The Exynos tanked falling from about 500,000 to around 450,000. So you’re now looking at an effectively 20% gap in performance.

Graphics:

It gets even worse when it comes to Graphics. While Samsung’s CPU is behind right from the get-go the graphics or GPU is actually on par. But this is what’s getting throttled as the temperature starts to rise. The graphics performance is falling from nearly 22,000 to 15,000. An average user notices a gap in performance.
For most of the things happen out of pretty similar speed on both. Flicking through home screens, loading up applications, and so on couldn’t tell the difference. But in specific cases, you can see the difference.


Long game sessions: Snapdragon vs Exynos

It didn’t seem to matter what game played. Both phones just flew through it as you kind of expect a firm that has ultra in its name. Even in the dolphin, Nintendo Wii emulator couldn’t pick Fault in either they were both running Animal Crossing at a completely locked framerate, no drops at all. You might know emulation is one of the most brutal tasks you can give to a CPU. The issue with Exynos only started to come in with prolonged sessions. After carried this on for about an hour and jumped to another heavy game then you feel it. The Exynos just started to bottle it. You can almost feel the chipset screaming on the inside and the framerate tanked to something like 15 frames per second.

Snapdragon vs Exynos on Samsung S20 Ultra

But in the Qualcomm no such issue. It was just 60 frames per second locked. In Snapdragon vs Exynos, Snapdragon is better in long game sessions.

The camera UI:

Shifting between the lenses is both smoother and faster. On snapdragon again this could improve in an update. Speaking of cameras the snapdragon even takes better photos to which you might be thinking how is that even possible, they have the same camera and they do. But it’s easy to forget that unlike with a PC where you’ll choose a processor and you’ll choose a graphics card with small phones the chipset contains everything. That’s why it’s called a system on a chip. So the difference between Snapdragon vs Exynos, it’s not just CPU, its the graphics, the modem, and the image signal processors.
So last year that the Snapdragon Galaxy S 10 took considerably better photos than the Exynos in Galaxy S10 in terms of dynamic range and just straight up the ability to draw out detail. That trend has continued. Here it’s not a world apart you can’t tell the difference at a glance. It is a very consistent trend. It mostly when cropping into your photos. The Snapdragon just appears able to bring out a sort of extra layer of detail. Textures that have almost disappeared on the Exynos, they’re sharp with Snapdragon. Again could be fixed in an update.

Snapdragon vs Exynos on Samsung S20 Ultra

Power Efficiency:

Both chipsets are cutting edge in terms of their fabrication process. But on day to day basis, the Snapdragon would just finish a day with more battery left. When tested both phones are on 100%. After heavy tasks for three solid hours, Exynos finished on 59% battery which would give it an expected screen on time of about seven hours but Snapdragon still had 71% which should give that phone an estimated screen on time of nine hours. Its the difference between good battery and off-the-charts amazing battery. It’s very very impressive. To make it a fair test, both phones were on the same brightness, they have the same apps installed on them. Both phones have had less than 10 charging cycles.


In terms of the key pillars, the Snapdragon phone is just better. So the question is why does Samsung bother with Exynos? Just pick the best chip and stick with it. But the thing is Samsung is the maker of the Exynos chips. So they’d use instead of buying components from another company like Qualcomm. Samsung could just use their parts, so they’d save a ton of money.


Conclusion: Snapdragon vs Exynos

There is a good chance the Exynos could be patched. But the only thing is that any kind of patch is going to bridge that performance gap. Snapdragon is a phone that performs better over a longer period. And just to kind of bring this all together, there’s a bittersweet lining to the whole thing. Samsung recently announced that they’re shutting down their CPU division. They’ll still likely have Exynos chip cells but instead of building their CPU cores for themselves, they’re gonna buy pre-built ones. So the good thing is that in future the performance disparity might be less versus Qualcomm. But the downside is that you’ve now got one less company competing in the mobile CPU market and usually competition is what pushes companies to innovate.

Post a Comment

0 Comments